Judges said the "concept of sex is binary"

Supreme Court ruling states definition of a woman is based on biological sex.

The Beaumont Society would like to say to all trans people affected by this morning’s Supreme Court ruling that we are here for you and that we share your concerns, frustrations and fears for what this means to us all.

A Haunting Vision of trans rights today

Trans women are not legally women under Equality Act, Supreme Court rules

The Aftermath of Chaos

TRans Rights Setback 20 Years

We are still working through what this will mean in our everyday lives but we express our disappointment in this decision in the strongest terms, which seems to go directly against the intentions of government when drafting the Gender Recognition and the Equalities Acts by concentrating on the specific wording instead of the expressed intent of the laws. 

The GRA was introduced into law in 2004 to expressly meet the requirements of the United Nations and the European Court of Human Rights and was stated at the time to provide a means for a trans person to legally change their sex for all intents and purposes.  We were also disappointed that not a single trans person or organisation was allowed to present evidence in court whereas several anti-trans organisations were, which for a case all about trans people appears to be a travesty.

We would like to remind you all of these simple facts: trans women are women, trans men are men, non-binary people are real and valid, and both they and intersex people have once again been ignored.  We are here to support you wherever you are on the trans spectrum.

Andrea Brookes

(Pronouns: she/her/hers)
Regional Contact: South England
Political Officer
Press Officer